“Sanctuary laws” encourage illegal immigration

By D.A. King, Douglas Enterprise, March 1, 2006

In today's Los Angeles, when a police officer sees a gang member on the street who he knows to be in our nation illegally, a 1979 city directive prevents him from apprehending that illegal alien because of his immigration status alone - even if he has knowledge that the subject has been previously deported because of a violent crime.

And even though it is a felony to re-enter the U.S. after deportation.

Manhattan Institute fellow Heather MacDonald reports that in Los Angeles, 95 percent of all outstanding warrants for homicide are for illegal aliens and as of January 2004, there were more than 1,200 such warrants.

Similar policies that prohibit or do not require law enforcement officers to report to the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE - formerly the INS) the presence of known felonious illegal aliens are also in place in Houston, Chicago, San Francisco, Denver and other American cities. Such regulations are generally known as "Sanctuary laws" and demonstrate the growing power of the Mexican government and the well-funded illegal alien lobby in our nation.

In Los Angeles, that sanctuary rule is known as "Special Order 40." Despite being prohibited under the Immigration Reform Act of 1996, it is a policy that is strictly enforced. So much for the rule of law.

Gangs that were previously known mainly in California, such as "Mara Salvatrucha" [MS 13] and the "18th Street Gang" now represent a serious and growing problem in Georgia and the Southeast. Officials report that the majority of these gang members are in our nation illegally, many with previous records of violent crimes.

The alarming increase in the number of gangs and the crimes they commit here is a direct result of our encouraging and assisting what Georgia state Senator Sam Zamarripa (D-DeKalb) evasively labels as "immigrants" with "incomplete documentation" to settle in our region by rewarding them with special treatment.

And jobs.

In today's Georgia, Atlanta policy affects the entire state. It is therefore important to know that in May 2004, Atlanta Mayor Shirley Franklin approved an agreement with the government of Mexico that recognizes the Mexican Consulate-issued Matricula Consular ID as valid for city business and services.

The process of that approval lasted more than a year, during which time there was little - if any - information on the process offered to the public.

Mayor Franklin remarked on an Atlanta call-in radio show in December 2004 that she did so "on advice of her police chief" and that she felt it was "a help." One wonders to whom.

Meanwhile, thousands of desperate people cross our intentionally unsecured borders every day with full knowledge that many of the laws Americans are expected to obey in America do not apply to them.

For many, their destination is Georgia and the Atlanta area.

If you build it, they will come.

Nobody I know of blames anyone for wanting to live in the greatest country in the world. But we do insist that our borders and laws be respected.

To most of us, it is clear that if we are to defend the rule of law and our children's future America, an effort at immigration-law enforcement must begin at home, on the state and local level.

If you tear it down, they will leave. That is the goal of pending Georgia legislation [SB 529] introduced by state Senator Chip Rogers, under that bill, the matricula consular would not prove legal residence.

In today's Atlanta, the mayor is encouraging lawbreakers "just looking for a better life" to come and remain here. It does not seem unreasonable for Georgians to wonder if the City of Atlanta is considering the implementation of a Special Order 40-type "sanctuary law" for its police force - or if one is already in place.

Respectfully, for those of us who do not want another Los Angeles or "Georgiafornia" - say it ain't so, Madam Mayor.

Por favor.

Fair Use: This site contains copyrighted material, the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of issues related to mass immigration. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information, see: www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode17/usc_sec_17_00000107----000-.html.
In order to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.