From March 15, 2007, NRO<\/p>\n
Amnesty Follies Center for Immigration Studies<\/a><\/p>\n When the Democrats won in November, there was a sense that an illegal-alien amnesty and huge increases in future immigration were inevitable. Even Rep. Tom Tancredo, the uber-hawk on immigration, was taken in: \u201cWe will fight it, we will lose,\u201d he told the Washington Times. \u201cIt will go to the Senate, it will pass. The president will sign it. And it will happen quickly because that\u2019s one thing they know they can pass.\u201d<\/p>\n Sometimes it\u2019s good to be wrong. <\/strong><\/p>\n This week, even as President Bush was pledging to the Mexican people that he would pursue their interests in working for an immigration bill, the political edifice of such a bill was falling apart.<\/p>\n Ted Kennedy and John McCain announced this week that they were giving up on crafting a new immigration bill and would instead revive the one approved last year by the (Republican) Senate Judiciary Committee (which was different in certain ways from the Hagel-Martinez amnesty finally passed by the Senate). There\u2019s going to be a lot more sound and fury in Congress over immigration, but, as Roll Call writes, \u201cit still appears unlikely that comprehensive reforms will move out of the [Senate] chamber before electoral concerns kill the bill.\u201d<\/p>\n It\u2019s interesting to note that, despite all the talk of the Right-Left, odd-bedfellows coalition backing the amnesty push, it is partisan differences that are torpedoing the effort. Both the good and bad elements of each political party\u2019s character are proving to be stumbling blocks.<\/p>\n On one side, there is the Republicans\u2019 characteristic support for law and order, for enforcement, and for American sovereignty. To appeal to that sentiment in Republicans skeptical of amnesty, the Bush administration has permitted a limited increase in immigration enforcement, after many years of intentional neglect (by 2004, for instance, only three employers in the entire country had been fined for knowingly hiring illegal aliens). This has brought to the fore an unattractive aspect of the Democrats, who have been ferociously critical of all these enforcement efforts; most recently, Sen. Kennedy himself has been relentlessly lambasting the administration for having the temerity to raid a Massachusetts leather factory (that supplied the Army!) that was full of illegal aliens knowingly hired by management. Republicans are thus naturally skeptical that Democrats are sincere in their commitment to the sustained, muscular enforcement that they\u2019ve promised in exchange for amnesty and increased immigration.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Immigration hawks need to demand that this new enforcement not only be continued, but that it be stepped up. For instance, the Justice Department should formally release a 2002 legal opinion highlighting the inherent authority of states and localities to arrest immigration violators (see a redacted version of the memo here)<\/a>. Congress must authorize the IRS and Social Security to share information with immigration authorities on the millions of illegal aliens they have information on. The Democratic leadership cannot be allowed to drop down the memory hole the fencing that Congress overwhelmingly approved last year. And, in general, additional measures needed to achieve attrition through enforcement <\/a>must be implemented.<\/strong><\/p>\n
\nThe false inevitability of “Comprehensive immigration reform.”<\/strong>
\nBy Mark Krikorian<\/p>\n