{"id":3663,"date":"2010-10-26T12:22:30","date_gmt":"2010-10-26T17:22:30","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/thedustininmansociety.com\/blog\/?p=3663"},"modified":"2010-10-26T12:28:53","modified_gmt":"2010-10-26T17:28:53","slug":"handout-too-much-factual-info","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.thedustininmansociety.org\/blog\/2010\/10\/26\/handout-too-much-factual-info\/","title":{"rendered":"Handout &#8211; too much factual info"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>\u201cUnsanctioned entry into the United States is a crime, 8 U.S.C. \u00a7 1325\u201d<\/strong><br \/>\nU.S. Supreme Court, 1982 <a href=\"http:\/\/thedustininmansociety.org\/blog\/?p=3155\">HERE<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Enclosed:<\/p>\n<p>*Text: <strong>8 USC 1325<\/strong>  <a href=\"http:\/\/www.law.cornell.edu\/uscode\/8\/usc_sec_08_00001325----000-.html\">HERE<\/a><\/p>\n<p>*Table of contents: <strong>8 USC 18<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.law.cornell.edu\/uscode\/html\/uscode18\/usc_sec_18_00000922----000-.html\">HERE<\/a><\/p>\n<p>*Text: <strong>8 USC 1357 <\/strong>&#8211;  287(g) codified into federal law \u2013 1996 <a href=\"http:\/\/www.law.cornell.edu\/uscode\/8\/usc_sec_08_00001357----000-.html\">HERE<\/a><\/p>\n<p>*Cover page, 457 U.S. 202 &#8211; <strong>Plyler v Doe Supreme Court Opinion<\/strong> \u2013 1982 <\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\u201cSince the late 19th century, the United States has restricted immigration into this country. Unsanctioned entry into the United States is a crime, 8 U.S.C. \u00a7 1325 and those who have entered unlawfully are subject to deportation, 8 U.S.C. \u00a7\u00a7 1251 1252 (1976 ed. and Supp. IV). But despite the existence of these legal restrictions, a substantial number of persons have succeeded in unlawfully entering the United States, and now live within various States, including the State of Texas<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.law.cornell.edu\/supct\/search\/display.html?terms=labor%20or%20employment%20or%20nlrb&#038;url=\/supct\/html\/historics\/USSC_CR_0457_0202_ZO.html\">HERE<\/a><\/p>\n<p>*Text: <strong>Washington Post Op-Ed<\/strong> July 27, 2010<br \/>\n\u201cWhat section 287(g) of immigration act really says\u201d<br \/>\nby Congressman Lamar Smith. Smith was a co-author of 287(g). <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2010\/07\/26\/AR2010072605234.html\">HERE<\/a><\/p>\n<p>*Text: <strong>Letter to the editor, The Wall Street Journal <\/strong>from Congressman Lamar Smith<br \/>\n\u201cAs the co-author of the legislation enacting the 287g program, I can attest that it was created to let state and local law-enforcement officials help enforce all immigration laws, not a select few. It only makes sense to remove illegal immigrants from the streets before they commit more serious crimes.\u201d<br \/>\nSmith was a co-author of 287(g).  <a href=\"http:\/\/online.wsj.com\/article\/NA_WSJ_PUB:SB124804297522763351.html\">HERE<\/a><\/p>\n<p><strong>*Recommended reading:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Congressional Research Service<\/strong>\u201cAuthority of State and Local Police to Enforce Federal Immigration Law\u201d September 17, 2010 <a href=\"http:\/\/www.fas.org\/sgp\/crs\/homesec\/R41423.pdf\">HERE<\/a><\/p>\n<p><em>The Congressional Research Service (CRS) works exclusively for the United States Congress, providing policy and legal analysis to committees and Members of both the House and Senate, regardless of party affiliation. As a legislative branch agency within the Library of Congress, CRS has been a valued and respected resource on Capitol Hill for nearly a century.<\/p>\n<p>CRS is well-known for analysis that is authoritative, confidential, objective and nonpartisan. Its highest priority is to ensure that Congress has 24\/7 access to the nation\u2019s best thinking.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u201cUnsanctioned entry into the United States is a crime, 8 U.S.C. \u00a7 1325\u201d U.S. Supreme Court, 1982 HERE Enclosed: *Text: 8 USC 1325 HERE *Table of contents: 8 USC 18 HERE *Text: 8 USC 1357 &#8211; 287(g) codified into federal law \u2013 1996 HERE *Cover page, 457 U.S. 202 &#8211; Plyler v Doe Supreme Court [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thedustininmansociety.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3663"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thedustininmansociety.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thedustininmansociety.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thedustininmansociety.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thedustininmansociety.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3663"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.thedustininmansociety.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3663\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thedustininmansociety.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3663"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thedustininmansociety.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3663"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thedustininmansociety.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3663"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}