{"id":307,"date":"2006-10-08T08:05:03","date_gmt":"2006-10-08T12:05:03","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thedustininmansociety.com\/blog\/?p=307"},"modified":"2006-10-08T08:07:52","modified_gmt":"2006-10-08T12:07:52","slug":"nation-or-notion-pjb-on-national-suicide-open-borders-and-illegal-aliens-who-use-america-as-an-address","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.thedustininmansociety.org\/blog\/2006\/10\/08\/nation-or-notion-pjb-on-national-suicide-open-borders-and-illegal-aliens-who-use-america-as-an-address\/","title":{"rendered":"Nation or Notion? PJB on national suicide, open borders and illegal aliens who use America as an address"},"content":{"rendered":"

The MEChA<\/a> slogan is “Por la Raza todo. Fuera de La Raza nada<\/strong>,” which translates, “For the race, everything. Outside of the race, nothing.” The MEChA slogan seems a conscious echo of the Fascist slogan of Mussolini: “Everything for the state, nothing outside the state, nothing above the state.”
\n— State of Emergency, By Patrick J. Buchanan<\/p>\n

In an address to the Young Men\u2019s Lyceum in Springfield, Illinois on Jan. 27, 1838, a 28-year-old lawyer spoke on \u201cthe Perpetuation of Our Political Institutions.\u201d Abe Lincoln asked and answered a rhetorical question: \u201cAt what point then is the approach of danger to be expected? I answer, if it ever reach us, it must spring up amongst us. It cannot come from abroad. If destruction be our lot, we must ourselves be its author and finisher. As a nation of freemen, we must live through all time, or die by suicide.\u201d Lincoln saw ahead a quarter of a century\u2014to civil war. The question that must be asked a century and a half after Lincoln\u2019s death is the one that troubled his generation. Are we on the path to national suicide?\u2026<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

This from Buchanan.org<\/a>, with thanks.<\/p>\n

Originally published in the American Conservative magazine, September 25, 2006<\/p>\n

Nation or Notion?<\/strong>
\nBy Patrick J. Buchanan<\/p>\n

America rose from kin and culture, not an abstract proposition.<\/p>\n

In an address to the Young Men\u2019s Lyceum in Springfield, Illinois on Jan. 27, 1838, a 28-year-old lawyer spoke on \u201cthe Perpetuation of Our Political Institutions.\u201d Abe Lincoln asked and answered a rhetorical question:<\/p>\n

At what point then is the approach of danger to be expected? I answer, if it ever reach us, it must spring up amongst us. It cannot come from abroad. If destruction be our lot, we must ourselves be its author and finisher. As a nation of freemen, we must live through all time, or die by suicide.<\/p>\n

Lincoln saw ahead a quarter of a century\u2014to civil war.<\/p>\n

The question that must be asked a century and a half after Lincoln\u2019s death is the one that troubled his generation. Are we on the path to national suicide?<\/p>\n

The America of yesterday has vanished, and the America of tomorrow holds promise of becoming a land our parents would not recognize. Considering the epochal changes that have taken place in our country, the political and economic powers working toward an end to national sovereignty and independence, it is impossible to be sanguine about the permanence of the nation. <\/p>\n

In Catholic doctrine, death occurs when the soul departs the body, after which the body begins to decompose. So it is with nations.<\/p>\n

Patriotism is the soul of a nation. When it dies, when a nation loses the love and loyalty of its people, the nation dies and begins to decompose.<\/p>\n

Patriotism is not nation-worship, such as we saw in Europe in the 1930s. It is not that spirit of nationalism that must denigrate or dominate other nations. It is a passionate attachment to one\u2019s own country\u2014its land, its people, its past, its heroes, literature, language, traditions, culture, and customs. \u201cIntellectuals tend to forget,\u201d wrote Regis Debray, \u201cthat nations hibernate, but empires grow old. The American nation will outlast the Atlantic Empire as the Russian nation will outlast the Soviet Empire.\u201d<\/p>\n

A century ago, the French historian and philosopher Ernest Renan described a nation:<\/p>\n

A nation is a living soul, a spiritual principle. Two things, which in truth are but one, constitute this soul, this spiritual principle. One is in the past, the other in the present. One is the common possession of a rich heritage of memories; the other is the actual consent, the desire to live together, the will to preserve worthily the undivided inheritance which has been handed down \u2026 The nation, like the individual, is the outcome of a long past of efforts, and sacrifices, and devotions \u2026 To have common glories in the past, a common will in the present; to have done great things together, to will to do the like again\u2014such are the essential conditions of the making of a people.<\/p>\n

This community called a nation is much more than a \u201cdivision of labor\u201d or a \u201cmarket.\u201d Added Renan:<\/p>\n

Community of interests is assuredly a powerful bond between men. But \u2026 can interests suffice to make a nation? I do not believe it. Community of interests makes commercial treaties. There is a sentimental side to nationality; it is at once body and soul; a Zollverein is not a fatherland.<\/p>\n

An economic union like the European Union is not a nation. An economy is not a country. An economic system should strengthen the bonds of national union, but the nation is of a higher order than the construct of any economist. A nation is organic; a nation is alive. A constitution does not create a nation. A nation writes a constitution that is the birth certificate of the nation already born in the hearts of its people. <\/p>\n

\u201c\u2018Nation\u2019\u2014as suggested by its Latin root nascere, to be born\u2014intrinsically implies a link by blood,\u201d wrote Peter Brimelow in National Review in 1992. \u201cA nation in a real sense is an extended family. The merging process through which all nations pass is not merely cultural, but to a considerable extent biological through intermarriage.\u201d<\/p>\n

Brimelow describes a nation as an \u201cethno-cultural community\u2014an interlacing of ethnicity and culture,\u201d that \u201cspeaks one language.\u201d He cites the late senator from New York:<\/p>\n

In his recent book Pandaemonium, Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan even used this rigorous definition, in an effort to capture both culture and ethnicity: a nation is a group of people who believe they are ancestrally related. It is the largest grouping that shares that belief. (Moynihan\u2019s italics)<\/p>\n

To be a nation, a people must believe they are a nation and that they share a common ancestry, history, and destiny. Whatever ethnic group to which we may belong, we Americans must see ourselves as of a unique and common nationality\u2014in order to remain a nation.<\/p>\n

There is a rival view, advanced by neoconservatives and liberals, that America is a different kind of nation, not held together by the bonds of history and memory, tradition and custom, language and literature, birth and faith, blood and soil. Rather, America is a creedal nation, united by a common commitment to a set of ideas and ideals.<\/p>\n

\u201cAmericans of all national origins, classes, religions, creeds and colors, have something in common \u2026 a political creed,\u201d wrote Gunnar Myrdal in 1944. During the battle over Proposition 187 in 1994, when 59 percent of the California electorate voted to cut off welfare to illegal aliens, Jack Kemp and Bill Bennett accepted Myrdal\u2019s idea, declaring, \u201cThe American national identity is based on a creed, on a set of principles and ideas.\u201d<\/p>\n

Irving Kristol embraced the Bennett-Kemp view when he compared the United States to the former USSR: \u201c[L]arge nations, whose identity is ideological, like the Soviet Union of yesterday and the United States of today, have ideological interests in addition to more material concerns.\u201d <\/p>\n

FDR seemed to agree, asserting, \u201cAmericanism is a matter of the mind and heart. Americanism is not, and never was, a matter of race and ancestry. A good American is one who is loyal to this country and to our creed of liberty and democracy.\u201d To be one nation, said Bill Clinton, all we need to do is define ourselves by \u201cour primary allegiance to the values America stands for and values we really live by.\u201d <\/p>\n

In his first inaugural address, George W. Bush endorsed the creedal-nation concept: \u201cAmerica has never been united by blood or birth or soil. We are bound by ideals that move us beyond our backgrounds, lift us above our interests, and teach us what it means to be citizens.\u201d<\/p>\n

To this idea of America as a creedal nation bound together not \u201cby blood or birth or soil\u201d but by \u201cideals,\u201d there is a corollary that has driven immigration policy for 40 years\u2014that people of any culture or continent can be assimilated with equal ease, depending only upon whether they assent to the tenets of our creed.<\/p>\n

Demonstrably, this is false. Human beings are not blank slates. Nor can they be easily separated from the abiding attachments of the tribe, race, nation, culture, community whence they came. Any man or woman, of any color or creed, can be a good American. But when it comes to the ability to assimilate into the United States, all nationalities, creeds, and cultures are not equal. <\/p>\n

Please read the rest here.<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The MEChA slogan is “Por la Raza todo. Fuera de La Raza nada,” which translates, “For the race, everything. Outside of the race, nothing.” The MEChA slogan seems a conscious echo of the Fascist slogan of Mussolini: “Everything for the state, nothing outside the state, nothing above the state.” — State of Emergency, By Patrick […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thedustininmansociety.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/307"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thedustininmansociety.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thedustininmansociety.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thedustininmansociety.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thedustininmansociety.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=307"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.thedustininmansociety.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/307\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thedustininmansociety.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=307"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thedustininmansociety.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=307"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thedustininmansociety.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=307"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}